GPT-5.5 (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.5 (Medium)
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.5 (Medium): 12.7% less intelligence, 8.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.8 | 29.5 | −12.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 12.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,095.12 | $2,277.12 | +8.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 8.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.17s | 16.67s | +49.2% Qwen3.7 Max is 49.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5.5 (Medium)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill