GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.5 (Xhigh): 4.7% more intelligence, 40.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 40.2 | +4.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 4.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,294.36 | $3,172.37 | −40.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 40.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 44.96s | 62.83s | +39.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 39.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill