GPT-5.5 (xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (xhigh) scores 35.0 points higher (56.3 vs 21.3) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($2778 vs $250; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (xhigh) when you need intelligence above 21.3, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 21.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.3 | 21.3 | −62.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 62.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,778.13 | $250.18 | −91.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 91.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 74.74s | 4.97s | −93.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 93.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 62.2% less intelligence, 91.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) scores 61.50 for $1974.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill