GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Luna (High) scores 11.1 points higher (32.1 vs 21.0) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($108 vs $27.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Luna (High) when you need intelligence above 21.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) when 21.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 21.0 | −34.6% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 34.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $27.02 | −75.0% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 75.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.30s | 5.71s | −65.0% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 65.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 34.6% less intelligence, 75.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/gpt-5-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/gpt-5-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill