GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs GPT-6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (High) scores 10.3 points higher (42.4 vs 32.1) but costs 5.6× as much to run the benchmark ($605 vs $108; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 32.1, and GPT-5.6 Luna (High) when 32.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 42.4 | +32.1% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 32.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $604.52 | +459.0% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 5.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.62s | 22.47s | +53.7% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 53.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (High) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 32.1% more intelligence, 459.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)GPT-6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/gpt-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/gpt-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill