GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 21.5% less intelligence, 295.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 244.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 25.2 | −21.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 21.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $427.73 | +295.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.41s | 46.15s | +244.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 244.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill