GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low): 71.4% less intelligence, 39.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.0 | 6.0 | −71.4% Ministral 3 14B is 71.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $27.02 | $37.56 | +39.0% Ministral 3 14B is 39.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.71s | 7.88s | +38.0% Ministral 3 14B is 38.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill