GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) vs Step 3.7 Flash

GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
21.00
Total cost
$27.0
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)21.019.5−7.1% Step 3.7 Flash is 7.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$27.02Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.90s23.89s+304.9% Step 3.7 Flash is 304.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $1.20$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.6 Luna (Low): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill