GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) scores 2.5 points higher (27.5 vs 25.0) but costs 7.9× as much to run the benchmark ($350 vs $44.3; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) when you need intelligence above 25.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) when 25.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.0 | 27.5 | +10.0% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 10.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $44.32 | $350.36 | +690.5% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 7.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.65s | 5.73s | −13.8% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 13.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium): 10.0% more intelligence, 690.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/gpt-5-6-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/gpt-5-6-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill