GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 27.4 points higher (52.4 vs 25.0) but costs 131× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $44.3; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) when 25.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.0 | 52.4 | +109.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $44.32 | $5,786.78 | +12956.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 131× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.19s | 44.47s | +618.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 618.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium): 109.6% more intelligence, 12956.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 618.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill