GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)
Ring-2.6-1T vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium): 33.6% less intelligence, 1198.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 320.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.0 | 16.6 | −33.6% Ring-2.6-1T is 33.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $44.32 | $575.60 | +1198.7% Ring-2.6-1T is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.82s | 24.45s | +320.1% Ring-2.6-1T is 320.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill