GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling (Xhigh)

GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
15.50
Total cost
$23.0
Thinking MachinesInkling (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
25.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Inkling (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)15.525.0+61.3% Inkling (Xhigh) is 61.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$22.97Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.03s14.58s+189.9% Inkling (Xhigh) is 189.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $1.20$1.00 / $4.05
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): what beats itInkling (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/inkling · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/inkling?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill