GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B

GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
15.50
Total cost
$23.0
MetaLlama 3.1 Instruct 8BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Llama 3.1 Instruct 8BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)15.56.9−55.5% Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B is 55.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$22.97Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)4.87s4.48s−8.0% Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B is 8.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $1.20$0.04 / $0.07
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): what beats itLlama 3.1 Instruct 8B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill