GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1

GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
15.50
Total cost
$23.0
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.1Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M2.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)15.520.9+34.8% MiniMax-M2.1 is 34.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$22.97Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)4.98s44.43s+792.2% MiniMax-M2.1 is 792.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $1.20$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill