GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 22.9 points higher (38.4 vs 15.5) but costs 70× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $23.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 15.5, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 15.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.5 | 38.4 | +147.7% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22.97 | $1,607.86 | +6899.8% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 70× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.98s | 24.07s | +383.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 383.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 147.7% more intelligence, 6899.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 383.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill