GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
15.50
Total cost
$23.0
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)15.57.2−53.5% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 53.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$22.97Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)4.98s89.78s+1702.8% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 1702.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $1.20$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill