GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash
GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Step 3.5 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.5 | 16.6 | +7.1% Step 3.5 Flash is 7.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22.97 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.87s | 18.34s | +276.6% Step 3.5 Flash is 276.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill