GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 5 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Step 5 Preview by StepFun? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Step 5 Preview scores 28.2 points higher (43.7 vs 15.5) but costs 52× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $23.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Step 5 Preview when you need intelligence above 15.5, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 15.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Step 5 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.5 | 43.7 | +181.9% Step 5 Preview is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22.97 | $1,190.26 | +5081.8% Step 5 Preview is 52× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.88s | 12.08s | +147.5% Step 5 Preview is 147.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Step 5 Preview vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 181.9% more intelligence, 5081.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 147.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Step 5 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Step 5 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill