GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh): 17.6% less intelligence, 150.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 28.5 | −17.6% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 17.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $179.33 | $449.37 | +150.6% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.86s | 5.32s | −88.4% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 88.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 41.30 for $175.
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill