GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) | Qwen3.5 Omni Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 12.5 | −63.9% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 63.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $179.33 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.86s | 3.92s | −91.5% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 91.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-5-omni-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-5-omni-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill