GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 17.0 | −50.9% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 50.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $179.33 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.85s | 19.57s | −45.4% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 45.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill