GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) scores 10.8 points higher (37.3 vs 26.5) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($320 vs $283; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.3 | 26.5 | −29.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 29.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $319.93 | $282.51 | −11.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 11.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 135.46s | 6.35s | −95.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 95.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Max): 29.0% less intelligence, 11.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill