GPT-5.6 Sol (High) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) scores 31.5 points higher (42.3 vs 10.8) but costs 6.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (High) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.3 | 10.8 | −74.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 74.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,487.34 | $232.95 | −84.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 84.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.48s | 8.25s | −38.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 38.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-5.6 Sol (High): 74.5% less intelligence, 84.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Sol (High)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-high/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-high/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill