GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) scores 8.6 points higher (42.1 vs 33.5) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2501 vs $637; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 42.1 | +25.7% GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is 25.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $2,500.72 | +292.4% GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.52s | 120.44s | +1313.6% GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is 1313.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 25.7% more intelligence, 292.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1313.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/gpt-5-6-terra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/gpt-5-6-terra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill