GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 10.4 points higher (43.9 vs 33.5) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $637; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Sol (Low).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 43.9 | +31.0% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 31.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $1,551.81 | +143.5% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.17s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 31.0% more intelligence, 143.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill