GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) scores 24.2 points higher (33.5 vs 9.3) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($637 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 9.3 | −72.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 72.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $43.98 | −93.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 93.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.26s | 10.37s | +25.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 25.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 72.2% less intelligence, 93.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill