GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) scores 11.7 points higher (33.5 vs 21.8) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($637 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 21.8 | −34.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 34.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $61.93 | −90.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 90.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.26s | 53.94s | +553.0% MiMo-V2.5 is 553.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 34.9% less intelligence, 90.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 553.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill