GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 13.1% more intelligence, 82.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 506.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 37.9 | +13.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $109.55 | −82.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 82.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.17s | 49.53s | +506.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 506.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill