GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) scores 26.5 points higher (33.5 vs 7.0) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($637 vs $122; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 7.0 | −79.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 79.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $121.78 | −80.9% Mistral Small 3.2 is 80.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.17s | 12.50s | +53.0% Mistral Small 3.2 is 53.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 79.1% less intelligence, 80.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill