GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) scores 22.7 points higher (33.5 vs 10.8) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($637 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 10.8 | −67.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 67.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $232.95 | −63.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 63.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.99s | 8.25s | +3.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 67.8% less intelligence, 63.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill