GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) scores 12.7 points higher (39.2 vs 26.5) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($997 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.2 | 26.5 | −32.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 32.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $997.39 | $282.51 | −71.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 71.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.79s | 6.33s | −50.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 50.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium): 32.4% less intelligence, 71.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill