GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019

GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
28.30
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.1 Flash 1019Off the frontier
Intelligence
43.90
Total cost
$1552
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)28.343.9+55.1% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 55.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,551.81— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)7.82sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning): what beats itLing 3.1 Flash 1019: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-non-reasoning/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-non-reasoning/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill