GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) scores 28.4 points higher (44.0 vs 15.6) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2082 vs $661; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.0 | 15.6 | −64.5% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 64.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,082.28 | $661.29 | −68.2% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 68.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 62.25s | 21.24s | −65.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 65.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh): 64.5% less intelligence, 68.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill