GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 3.0 points higher (47.0 vs 44.0) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $2082; both flagship class). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.0 | 44.0 | −6.4% GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is 6.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,464.84 | $2,082.28 | −39.9% GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is 39.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 113.20s | 47.67s | −57.9% GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is 57.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max): 6.4% less intelligence, 39.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill