GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 29.5 points higher (47.0 vs 17.5) but costs 24× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.0 | 17.5 | −62.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 62.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,464.84 | $145.77 | −95.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 95.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 91.96s | 24.76s | −73.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 73.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max): 62.8% less intelligence, 95.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill