GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 13.3 points higher (47.0 vs 33.7) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $1737; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.0 | 33.7 | −28.3% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 28.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,464.84 | $1,737.18 | −49.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 49.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 91.96s | 19.50s | −78.8% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 78.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max): 28.3% less intelligence, 49.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill