GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 6.8 points higher (47.0 vs 40.2) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $3172; both flagship class). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 Max.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.0 | 40.2 | −14.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 14.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,464.84 | $3,172.37 | −8.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 8.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.07s | 62.87s | −40.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 40.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max): 14.5% less intelligence, 8.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill