GPT-5.6 Terra (High) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (High) by OpenAI or GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) scores 6.7 points higher (34.2 vs 27.5) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($768 vs $350; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Low).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (High) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.2 | 27.5 | −19.6% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 19.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $767.78 | $350.36 | −54.4% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 54.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.30s | 5.73s | −21.5% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 21.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (High): 19.6% less intelligence, 54.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Terra (High)GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-high/gpt-5-6-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-high/gpt-5-6-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill