GPT-5.6 Terra (High) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (High) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) scores 12.4 points higher (34.2 vs 21.8) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($768 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (High) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (High) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.2 | 21.8 | −36.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 36.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $767.78 | $61.93 | −91.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 91.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.58s | 66.80s | +915.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 915.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (High): 36.3% less intelligence, 91.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 915.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-5.6 Terra (High)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-high/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-high/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill