GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) vs Kimi K3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 16.1 points higher (43.6 vs 27.5) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $350; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 27.5, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) when 27.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) | Kimi K3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 27.5 | 43.6 | +58.5% Kimi K3 (Max) is 58.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $350.36 | $3,658.07 | +944.1% Kimi K3 (Max) is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.75s | 50.42s | +776.9% Kimi K3 (Max) is 776.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Low): 58.5% more intelligence, 944.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 776.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Kimi K3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-low/kimi-k3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-low/kimi-k3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill