GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) vs Ministral 3 3B

Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.

Trade-off

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 27.50
Total cost: $350

MistralMinistral 3 3BOn the open-weights frontier

Intelligence: 4.80
Total cost: $12.2

Verdict

Depends on your budget

GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) scores 22.7 points higher (27.5 vs 4.8) but costs 29× as much to run the benchmark ($350 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.

Metric	GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)	Ministral 3 3B	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	27.5	4.8	−82.5% Ministral 3 3B is 82.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$350.36	$12.23	−96.5% Ministral 3 3B is 96.5% cheaper
End-to-end time (lower is better)	5.73s	3.32s	−42.1% Ministral 3 3B is 42.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$2.00 / $12.0	$0.10 / $0.10
Input modalities	Text, Image	Text, Image

Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Low): 82.5% less intelligence, 96.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.1% faster end-to-end.

Open this matchup in the interactive picker GPT-5.6 Terra (Low): what beats it Ministral 3 3B: what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.

GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-low/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-low/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill