GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 20.6 points higher (48.1 vs 27.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($3905 vs $350; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 27.5, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) when 27.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 27.5 | 48.1 | +74.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 74.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $350.36 | $3,904.90 | +1014.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.91s | 59.16s | +901.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 901.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Low): 74.9% more intelligence, 1014.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 901.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-low/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-low/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill