GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) scores 20.8 points higher (30.1 vs 9.3) but costs 9.6× as much to run the benchmark ($447 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 9.3 | −69.1% Mistral Large 3 is 69.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $446.53 | $46.41 | −89.6% Mistral Large 3 is 89.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.06s | 7.23s | +19.3% Mistral Large 3 is 19.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium): 69.1% less intelligence, 89.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill