GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) scores 20.9 points higher (30.1 vs 9.2) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($447 vs $405; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 9.2 | −69.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 69.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $446.53 | $405.10 | −9.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 9.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.61s | 6.22s | +10.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 10.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium): 69.4% less intelligence, 9.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill