GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.6 Terra (medium): 53.7% less intelligence, 2.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 12.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.6 | 21.1 | −53.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 53.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.23 | $247.26 | +2.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.90s | 6.61s | +12.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 12.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $15.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill