GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (High) scores 18.0 points higher (38.8 vs 20.8) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1244 vs $256; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 20.8, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 20.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 38.8 | +86.5% Grok 4.5 (High) is 86.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $1,243.85 | +386.3% Grok 4.5 (High) is 4.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.10s | 20.04s | +292.9% Grok 4.5 (High) is 292.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.5 (High) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 86.5% more intelligence, 386.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 292.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/grok-4-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/grok-4-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill