GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 5.0 points higher (25.8 vs 20.8) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $256; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 20.8, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 20.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 25.8 | +24.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 24.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $992.88 | +288.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.09s | 43.10s | +746.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 746.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 24.0% more intelligence, 288.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 746.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill