GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 9.3 points higher (30.1 vs 20.8) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $256; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 20.8, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 20.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 30.1 | +44.7% Kimi K3 (Low) is 44.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $1,190.42 | +365.4% Kimi K3 (Low) is 4.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.10s | 49.80s | +876.5% Kimi K3 (Low) is 876.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 44.7% more intelligence, 365.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 876.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill