GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) scores 16.0 points higher (20.8 vs 4.8) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($256 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 4.8 | −76.9% Ministral 3 3B is 76.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $12.23 | −95.2% Ministral 3 3B is 95.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.90s | 3.29s | −32.9% Ministral 3 3B is 32.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 76.9% less intelligence, 95.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill