GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 31.7% less intelligence, 394.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 245.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 14.2 | −31.7% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 31.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $1,263.80 | +394.1% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 4.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.10s | 17.64s | +245.9% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 245.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill